top of page

Our legal and psychological Expertise 

Criminal psychology text from wooden cubes. The term psychology profession. Close up..jpg

From 2019 to 2021, Dr. Chu served as a clinical psychologist at the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (Juvenile Justice Mental Health Program, Dorothy Kirby Center). Throughout her tenure, Dr. Chu has completed a wide array of training courses through the National Institute of Corrections (NIC), U.S. Department of Justice. While working within the criminal justice system, she reviewed a diverse range of expert evaluations and provided effective treatment to underrepresented juvenile adolescents who were faced with felony and misdemeanor charges, including first-degree murder, manslaughter, terrorism, assault, rape, possession of controlled substances, and armed burglary.

Criminal Forensic Evaluations

Criminal forensic evaluations are conducted in criminal cases to determine the defendant’s mental state and behavior. Such evaluations determine whether the defendants are competent to stand trial, had the mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of their actions at the time of the crime, or were under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the offense. These evaluations are also used to determine the defendant’s reoffending risk and to provide treatment or intervention recommendations.

​​

​​

What types of cases require a forensic psychological evaluation? 

 

The most common types of cases that require forensic psychological evaluations include Competency to Stand Trial,  Criminal Responsibility (Insanity Defense),  Risk Assessment, Mental Health Diversion, Child Custody and Parental Fitness, Juvenile Delinquency, Personal Injury Claims, Disability Claims, Sex Offender Evaluations, Fitness for Duty Evaluations, and  Immigration Cases, etc. 

 

 

What is the process of conducting a forensic psychological evaluation? ​

 

The process of conducting a forensic psychological evaluation involves the following:

Dark Background

1.

Referral and initial consultation

What is the difference between criminal and civil forensic evaluation?

​

Forensic psychological evaluations can be broadly categorized into criminal and civil evaluations, each serving different purposes and addressing distinct legal questions, while civil forensic evaluations are conducted to address psychological issues that arise in the context of civil legal matters. 

​​​​​​

Key Takeaways:

​

Forensic psychological evaluations are crucial tools for the legal system to gain insights into an individual’s mental state and behavior. This assessment serves to aid the court in making informed decisions regarding mental health-related matters. Whether it is a criminal or civil case, forensic evaluations play a significant role in providing valuable information that can shape the outcome of legal proceedings. Understanding the importance and process of forensic evaluations helps us appreciate the significant impact they have on the justice system.

​

​

Mental Health Diversion Evaluations

​

California Penal Code § 1001.36 authorizes the court, in its discretion, to order pretrial mental health diversion for eligible defendants charged with qualifying misdemeanor or felony offenses that are not excluded by statute, upon consideration of the positions of the defense and the prosecution and a determination that statutory eligibility and suitability criteria are satisfied.

​

Eligibility requires that the defendant suffer from a DSM-diagnosed mental disorder, excluding antisocial personality disorder and pedophilia, and that the mental disorder was a significant motivating, causal, or contributing factor in the commission of the charged offense. The court must further find that the defendant’s symptoms are amenable to mental health treatment, that the defendant consents to diversion and agrees to comply with treatment, and that the defendant does not pose an unreasonable risk to public safety if treated in the community.

​

A Mental Health Diversion Evaluation is a forensic psychological assessment conducted for legal purposes to assist defense counsel and the court in evaluating the statutory requirements set forth in Penal Code § 1001.36. Evaluations may include a forensic clinical interview, review of relevant records, collateral information when available, and psychological testing when clinically and legally indicated. The resulting report addresses diagnostic formulation, functional impairment, nexus between mental health symptoms and the charged conduct, treatment responsiveness, and risk-related considerations.

​

Reports are prepared in neutral, objective, and legally appropriate language, organized to correspond with Penal Code § 1001.36, and structured to assist the court in making informed diversion determinations. Certain offenses are expressly excluded from diversion under the statute. Upon successful completion of diversion, criminal charges are dismissed, and the arrest may be deemed never to have occurred, subject to statutory limitations and exceptions.

​

Statutory Criteria Addressed in the Evaluation

 

Penal Code § 1001.36(a)–(c)

The Mental Health Diversion Evaluation is structured to address the statutory eligibility and suitability factors the court is required to consider, including:

​

§ 1001.36(a) — Court Discretion

  • Presentation of objective forensic findings to assist the court in exercising its discretion after consideration of the positions of the defense and prosecution

​

§ 1001.36(b)(1) — Qualifying Mental Disorder

  • DSM-consistent diagnostic formulation

  • Documentation of current or recent diagnosis and treatment history

  • Review of medical, psychiatric, and collateral records supporting the diagnosis

​

§ 1001.36(b)(2) — Nexus to Charged Offense

  • Analysis of whether the mental disorder was a motivating, causal, or contributing factor in the alleged offense

  • Consideration of contemporaneous symptoms, behavioral observations, and relevant documentary evidence

​

§ 1001.36(c)(1) — Treatment Responsiveness

  • Clinical opinion regarding the amenability of symptoms to mental health treatment

  • Identification of recommended level of care and treatment modalities

​

§ 1001.36(c)(2)–(3) — Consent and Treatment Compliance

  • Evaluation of the defendant’s capacity and willingness to consent to diversion and comply with treatment conditions

​

§ 1001.36(c)(4) — Public Safety Considerations

  • Assessment of risk and protective factors relevant to community-based treatment

  • Consideration of violence history, current charged offense, treatment structure, and stabilizing supports

​

​

Request a 15-minute Free Consultation

(Only for Adult Individual Therapy)

Now Accepting New Patients

​

          Note: Our online contact form is not HIPAA-secure. For your privacy and security, do not include personal health information (PHI) or any sensitive details. 

Our primary clinical office is located in Duarte, CA. We offer in-person services in Duarte and Newport Beach, CA. We also provide teletherapy for California residents.

​

Duarte 

  931 Buena Vista Street, Suite 307, Duarte, CA 91010

Newport Beach

​

  5000 Birch Street, West Tower, Suite 3000 Newport Beach, CA 92660 

Tel: (949) 220-3775

​

Email: psylexis26@gmail.com   

NOTICE TO CONSUMERS: The Department of Consumer Affairs’ Board of Psychology receives and responds to questions and complaints regarding the practice of psychology. If you have questions or complaints you may contact the Board on the Internet at www.psychology.ca.gov, by e-mailing bopmail@dca.ca.gov, calling 1-866-503-3221 or writing to the following address: Board of Psychology 1625 North Market Blvd, Suite N-215 Sacramento, CA 95834

© 2024 by Dr. Chu. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page